▶ Your Answer :Thought-provoking current issue concerns whether students should give weight to history and literature or science and mathematics. Personally, I strongly disagree with above topic saying that studying history and literature is more important than science and math. To support my reasons, I am going to enumerate reasons below from now on.
To begin with, we have to aware of the validity of historical facts. Since we've never been to past, we don't exactly know what happend then. According to this saying ' History is written by the winner.', our knowledge of past may be a fake. It could be saying too much, but we have to admit the fact that winners are likely to forge the history and make it advantageous to them. For example, strong country's can describe them as a righteous country and others to be savage. If we take it seriously, we know that history cannot be 100% exactly right. On the other hand, Mathmatics always have the manifest answer. There could not be a forge on mathmatics. '1+1=2' This fomula is easy, simple and above all things, certain.
Secondly, even though literature is important subject to learn, still It is too subjective. People could translate it in many different ways. So to speak, there is not exact answer to defining literatures. In contrast, scientific fact's can't be subjective. They are objective facts confirmed by many other experiments. Chemistry, as an example, has to be clear. If it's not, it could cause explosions or fatal harm to a conductor.
These are the reasons why I think Science and Math are more essential than history and Literature. |