▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage contends that three people might have possibly written the book Pearll Poet, which was found in England. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several points that contradicts the writer’s argument.
First, the lecturer argues that the writer would not be John M. One significant reason is that at that time, the book was spread out by copying it by hand, so it is not certain that this book's writing is that of an original author. This casts a doubt on the writer’s statement that this the writer would be John M because the handwriting written on the book resembles that of his own its writing is in accordance with his own.
Second, according to the lecturer, there is difference in used dialect between hugh's (이름이라면 Hugh’s 라고 해야겠죠?) poem and the book found detected book. Therefore, even though they use same modifier, they indicate different meaning. This refutes the writer's assertion that writer would be Hugh. This is because described region in the book (이라고 써도 될 것 같네요~) a detected book about knight is consistent with described region in a poem written by Hugh.
The final point made by the lecturer is that this book, a poem collection, must have been geen written by one author because the same word was used several times. This counters the writer’s claim that the book must have been written by several authors considering that the book comprises 4 poems.
(양 쪽 입장은 다 캐치하신 것 같은데요.. 다만 표현하는 데 있어서 조금 더 깔끔하게 표현하실 수 있도록 연습하시면 좋을 것 같습니다. 내용면에서 보충해야할 것은 없는지 reading passage 와 lecture script 확인하시면서 비교/대조 해보시면 좋을 것 같습니다. 수고하셨습니다~^^) |