▶ Your Answer :
Both the lecture and the reading discuss with instrumental music programs. The lecture asserts that the programs are needed to students. This explanation contradicts the reading passage’s assertion that the curriculums are not worth for students to learn.
To begin with, in response to the reading, the professor says that it is helpful for students to take instrumental music classes. The professor claims that by taking the classes, it makes students study other subjects well. For example, learning music helps students to develop abstract thinking for math studying. Also, it enables them to improve the ability to understand language. This explanation opposes the reading passage’s argument that it is useless for students to study music, because it reduces the amount of studying other more important subjects.
In addition, schools are able to reduce their budget for instrumental music classes. To be specific, there are two symbolic ways to reduce it. The first method is to hire volunteers who can teach music for students. The second thing is to get donation of instrument from people who don’t use their instruments. This find directly refutes the reading passage’s position by stating that the classes are not effective because it takes much money to buy instruments.
Lastly, the lecturer rebuts the reading passage’s claim by saying that taking instrumental music programs give students a reward. The lecturer says that by doing it, students can develop a way to express themselves. It is very important to express oneself in society. Also, although students are not interested to music, they would be inspired music, and then they can be very famous artists. This finding effectively casts doubt on the reading passage’s argument that every student has the talent to be a successful musician, so the class is not worth.
|