▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage asserts that video games, in particular, first-person action games in particular, are harmful to children. However, the lecturer examines that video games do not actually affect them.
First of all, the reading passage describes that those who are addicted to playing television or video games show typical symptoms such as compulsive attitude, loss of interest in other activities(,) or lying to loved ones. Also, these behaviors lead children to destruct the complete destruction of a healthy lifestyle completely. Doubting on this idea, the lecturer insists that children tend to be addicted to something that they like such as reading books, eating, or studying. (why? Lecturer 가 이런 입장을 support 하는 근거를 제시했을 것입니다. 이 부분까지 써주세요.)
Second, the reading passage explains about aggressive tendencies that the children would have. Especially the violent video games encourage the children to fight at school and even inspire them to commit the murders. On the other hand, the lecturer states that not only the video games but also other factors (lecture 에서 언급된 것들이 있다면 여기에 써주세요.) in other aspects, would influence on children’s behavior/ would make children have same tendencies the same tendencies can be found.
Lastly, the reading passage points out the children are wasting their time in playing games in front of screen are allowed to waste huge amounts of time exposed to the screen. Video games make children lose their ability to manage time wisely and productively Those games give no benefit while the children can use their time wisely and productively. On the contrary, the lecturer asserts counters that video games are safe values which have positive side. (safe value 가 무엇을 말하는 지 잘 모르겠네요..구체적인 설명 부탁드려요~) These make children more intelligent(,) and help helping them to solve questions and make quick decision.
양쪽의 입장을 구체적으로 설명할 수 있도록 글을 구성하시면 좋겠습니다. 수고하셨습니다~ |