The lecturer claims that she can not see any of clear evidence that represents the woman in the Yale miniature is Jane Grey. This counters the reading passage's claim that there are several reliable proofs which show the woman is Jane Grey.
To begin with, the lecturer says it is clear that the number is 18, but not 17. The last roman numeral is rubbed away, so it seemed as 17. Also, historical records shows that she was 16 years old when she was crowned. This contradicts the reading passage's claim that inscrpition that reads ANO XVII tells us Jane Grey's age.
In addition, the lecturer asserts that the jewel was very common at that time in England. It was frequently worned by wealthy woman. Also, there is no clear evidence to prove the jewel belongs to her. This casts doubt on the reading passage's claim that a jewel on the woman's dress was Jane's item.
Lastly, the lecturer insists that in botanical perspective, the yellow flower is not a wallflower. There is nothing which represents Jane's husband. Also, there is no mean to include symbols of her brother. This rufutes the reading passage's claim that some botanical symbols represent Jane's husband and brother.