An
intriguing topic of discussion at hand is whether all scientific discoveries
should be shared among other (the) scientists. The answer to this question can vary
greatly depending on the individual perspectives. Thus, the jury may still be
out but as far as I am concerned I agree with the statement. In this essay, I
will present the two reasons supporting my standpoint as follow(ing:)
(Try not to end the intro with “as following”)
First
of all, scientists should share their own research for progressive social life
as a (the)
leader(s) of society. Although no one denies
that such as valuable invents(ion) or
discoveries are important as individual, it’s more justifiable to content that
the scientist (should) open their result of discoveries (research)
for common (the
welfare of the) communities of welfare
and the world of well-being, not only private purpose. For illustration, I
would like to draw the case of my experience when I was university student. My
professor announced his discoveries to relevant company and (to) the world of
science (community) regarding modern (the
cutting-edge) motor engine. His venerable behavior leads advance and
development of modern automobile. On the other hand, modern science issue needs
expert to address contemporary scientific problem so complex that common people
can not (cannot)
solve. In this regard, I strongly insist that the scientist should open their worthy discoveries to the
world as well as (to their respective fields of)
science fields.
Second,
announcing the significant discoveries among the
middle of science is able to (will) encourage
the scientist(s) to study in competitive
environment. This will help to increase
competitive power in the scientific fields of nation (??). According to the
recent (a) research released in 2012
by (a) scientific journal, the statistics
(the researchers) found out that the science area that address much more thesis (fields active with research) gives rise to a
better motivation than other science fields. Furthermore, this (such) environment(s) foster (lead to) investment of
(by the) government
for science. If one attract(s) enough
money to implement experiment from the government, one can concentrate on their
specific area more effectively than ever before. Naturally, scientist(s’) quality
(capacity) will be improved through above mentioned virtuous (the positive) circle. In this sense, it’s necessary
to open discoveries among the scientist(s) world, which leads (to
the) advent of the strong scientific world.