▶ Your Answer :
The
lecturer argues that problems associated with single-stream recycling are not
serious. This sharply contrasts with the reading passage's claim that this
method has many shortcomings.
To begin
with, the lecturer contends that single-stream recycling is not dangerous as
being said. To be specific, since it is not difficult to use carts, if people
are well-educated how to use carts, it is unlikely that they cause traffic
hazards or leave materials such as bottles on the street. This rebuffs the
reading passage's assertion that the single-stream system is perilous.
On the top
of that, the lecturer insists that the amount of recycled materials increases
by single-stream recycling. This is because, people are more willing to recycle
materials when they can just recycle materials without the process of sorting.
To be specific, though there can be one percent loss of gathered materials
through this way because of contaminating problem, there should be fifteen
percent increase in the amount of recycling materials when people can make use
of this method. Thus the latter exceeds the former entirely. This contradicts
the reading passage's claim that single-stream method has an effect on
decreasing the amount of available recycling materials.
Lastly, the
lecturer maintains that the single-stream recycling is cost-effective. To be
specific, even though there is additional cost in sorting process, the cost for
collecting materials decreases far more. Thus, overall cost is smaller than the
traditional recycling program. This refutes reputes the reading passage's argument that
single-stream recycling is more costly than the old method.
두 가지 대조되는 의견과 주장을 잘 비교해서 서술해주셨습니다. 정말
수고 많으셨습니다! J
|