▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage asserts that artificial turf is beneficial is about the advantages of artificial turfs. However, the speaker contradicts the reading with opposing view.
To begin with, while the reading passage argues that maintaining the maintainance of artificial turf is more economical than natural grass, the speaker actually points out that it might injure injures athletes. Because it is made of plastics, a friction frission of artificial turf has potential danger to hurt players holds higher possibility of danger to players. She also mentions that baseball and soccer players are exposed to of unwanted injures by arfiticial turfs.
On top of that the speaker casts doubt on the reading’s claim claims that using arfitical turfs is more sustainable choice because they do not need to be replaced. 문장 내 쓰여진 많은 동사가 해석을 어렵게 했던 경우입니다. Casts 와 claims 라는 두 개의 동사 때문에 speaker 의 입장인지 reading 의 입장인지 헷갈렸습니다. 정확하게 써주세요. Her main reason is the risk of rubber chips installed or protection of base. (문장 잘 이해되지 않네요.) According to the speaker, the rubber chips have potentiality has pottential to make an athlete more likely to get a cancer because it is made of a rubber material. The burning smell of artificial arfiticial turfs also indicates its negative influence on athletes' health.
Furthermore, the speaker denies the reading passage’s assertion maintains that artificial artifical turf provides fresher and more uniform look of the playground. She mentions that more effort is needed to maintain artificial turf atfitical turf needs more elaborated effort of maintenance because it prevents bacteria from growing bactarias to grow. Thus, it never benefits to environment and people should stop using artificial turfs.
For these reasons, the speaker challenges the reading's point about the benefits of artificial turf.
Typographical error 이 너무 많습니다. 반드시 proofreading 해주세요. 또한 문장이 많이 pattern 화 되어있습니다. Speaker denies/casts doubts on reading’s claim 이런 식으로요. 다양하게 표현해주시구요~ 의미 전달이 분명하게 되도록 정확하게 써주세요! 수고하셨습니다! |