▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage asserts that the government needs to pay more attention to NASA (NASA 의 사업이나 활동에 더 관심을 가져야 한다는 등의 조금 더 자세한 설명 부탁드려요~) and increase financial support. However, the speaker contradicts the reading with several reasons / opposing view.
To begin with, while the reading passage argues that we should spend more money on exploring space for space program to develop technology for future relocation of human beings in space, the speaker actually points out (that) the large amount of budget during Cold War period was just abnormal. The government spend spent to much fortune fund on space expedition because of the race of space exploration between with Soviet Union rather than the pure development of space technology. Lecture 의 입장 clear 하지 않습니다. Lecturer 가 어떤 입장을 보였고 그 근거로는 무엇을 내세웠는 지 정확하게 밝혀주시면 좋을 것 같습니다.
On top of that, the passage emphasizes that in order to protect people preserve mankinds from potential natural nature disasters such as asteroids (소행성 자체가 재앙이 되지 않습니다. 소행성의 충돌 등의 예를 적어야 합니다.), the government we should support NASA programs. However, the speaker claims that there are various ways places to use our budget other than space programs. The money can be used for more urgent and more worthwhile ways matters such as social welfare, recovering economy or reducing unemployment.
Furthermore, the speaker disagrees with denies the claim of reading passage of that maintains maintaining that the possible alternative resources in outer space is attractive to continue search (search what?). Her main reason is that we still can find other forms of resources inside the earth rather than space. He also emphasizes that it is unclear whether we can find resources in space or not. (그인지 그녀 인지 한가지를 정해서 써야 합니다. ) Instead, oceans or volcanos can be one of the best place of alternative resources. For example, as well as gas hydrate is considered as an attractive alternative resource in earth. (상대적으로 reading 의 입장은 구체적으로 논해지지 않은 것 같습니다.)
For these reasons, the speaker challenges the reading's main, that the need of more investment on NASA's space programs.
수고하셨습니다!!! ^^ |