▶ Your Answer :
The lecture presents a rather cogent argument that T.rex was were able move rapidly enough to catch its their prey. This explicitly runs counter to the reading passage’s assertion that T.rex could not move fast.
First, the lecturer states that the idea that T.rex could not run in the jungle is flaw. He claims that T.rex, like other animals such as tigers, would not have chased prey quickly but rather slowly approach to catch them. prey 와 them.. 수일치가 이루어지지 않았네요. 일치시켜 주세요. The lecturer believes that T.rex would have smart strategies in catching prey. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s argument that T.rex could not run because they inhabited in jungles which are unfavorable place for large animals to run. (large animals 가 뛰기에 편한 곳인 정글에 살아서 trex 는 뛰지 못한다? 그러면 trex 는 충분히 크지 않기 때문이라는 논리인가요? 조금 더 구체성을 주세요~)
Secondly, according to the lecture, animals do not need huge legs in order to run. He further explains that the size and the length of animals’ legs has no evident relations with their ability to run. The animals such as horses and chickens, which can run, capable of running, resemble thin and long legs of T.rex are similar with T.rex which have thin and long legs. This contradicts with the reading passage’s claim that T.rex moved slowly because it has they have very thin legs and heavy bodies.
The last point that the lecturer mentions is that there is no exact measurement of the body rate of T.rex. According to him, there has not been any information pertaining to exact measurement of T.rex’s body rate. Therefore, the lecturer believes that it is impossible to judge their body mass distribution of T.rex. This point sharply criticizes the reading passage’s argument that T.rex could not run because of their body mass distribution which is not adequate for them to run. (밑줄 쳐놓은 부분들을 보면 수 일치가 제대로 이루어지지 않은 듯 하네요. 확인하신 후, 일치시켜주세요.)
전반적으로 양쪽의 입장을 잘 정리하셨습니다. 수고하셨습니다~ |