*진하게 표시한 부분은 제가 파악한 문단의 주요 내용이니 참고하세요^^
The professor firmly disagrees with the reading passage, which declares that introducing gasoline tax would harm the overall U.S economy. Instead, the professor says that gasoline tax would not give huge impact on the economy. topic과 두 지문의 반대되는 입장을 간결하게 잘 소개한 서론입니다.
To begin with, the author of the reading contends that raising the gas tax would obstruct the economy. He mentions that it would make people spend more money on purchasing gasoline, which make people is hard to afford it. Also, he says that they would spend less on buying other products, which can dramatically harm the economy, which depends on the purchase of customers. On the contrary, the lecturer affirms that it would not affect the economy greatly. He claims that the economy is it too complicated to be aggravated from only a small percents percentage increase in gasoline. In addition, he contends that there are many other factors damaging the economy enormously such as public healthcare services and repairing basic facilities in the country. 두 지문의 대립되는 입장을 잘 소개한 문단입니다. 통합형은 독립형 문제처럼 구체적인 설명이나 논증을 필요로 하지 않고 간결하고 일목요연한 '내용정리'를 원하는 유형이기 때문에 더 간결하게 내용을 정리하는 것도 좋겠습니다.
The passage also says that an increase in the gas tax would make people who make little money harder. He says they do not have enough money to pay for increased gasoline tax. He also claims that they could even have difficulty of going out to work or for other purposes if the tax is added on gasoline. However, the lecturer listening says there are many alternatives for the problems. He refers to the tax breaks for the poor as an example. Also, he mentions that the government could let them get discount for the gasoline. the poor에 관련된 내용 대립을 잘 정리한 문단입니다.
전반적으로 내용 정리에 필요한 부분을 잘 노트테이킹해주신 것 같습니다. 내용을 정리할 때 두 지문이 다루고 있는 topic이 무엇인지 정확하게 정한 후 그에 초점을 맞춰서 내용을 정리하면 더 일목요연한 답안이 될 수 있으니 참고하세요. 문제지의 답안과 직접 확인하셔서 노트테이킹에서 빠진 부분이나 잘못 이해된 부분은 없는지 다시 한 번 내용 체크해주세요. 수고 많으셨습니다^^