An intriguing topic of discussion at hand is whether scientists are responsible for the negative impact of their discoveries. The answer to this question can vary greatly, depending on the individual perspectives. Thus, the jury may still be out, but as far as I am concerned, I disagree with the statement. In this essay I will present two reasons supporting my standpoint as follows.
To begin with, the important thing is not what is discovered or invented, but how to use. In other words, knowledge itself is neither bad nor good while people can utilize knowledge on bad purpose. Therefore, people should not limit discoveries or invention by burdening responsibilities on scientists. Instead, inappropriate use of knowledge should be regulated. For example, if a person commits a murder with a knife, we do not punish its maker for making a knife. The reason is that the maker just made a knife for people without any harmful purpose.
On top of that, it is impossible to forecast what impacts discoveries will have in the future. This is attributed to the reason that a single trivial discovery can greatly affect human lives when combined with other knowledge making a synergy effect. For instance, take a look at the invention of nuclear bomb. When a scientist discovered the existence of nuclear and its energy, nobody could expect it will bring about disasters because it seemed just beneficial information. However, people continually developed technologies to harness its power and succeeded by using numerous other scientific foundations. As we all know, this successful result, nuclear bomb, ended up killing thousands of thousand people and is still threatening people around the world.
In conclusion, I strongly argue for my standpoint on account of the two reasons mentioned above. Once again, the verdict may still be out. However, I personally believe that two of my rationales are sufficiently convincing enough to represent the viewpoints of the majority of people who are in favor of my claim.