▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage asserts that we should not regulate a politician's term because the limitation negatively affects society. However, the speaker contradicts the reading with opposing view.
To begin with, while the reading passage argues that the term limit is wasteful leaves political waste because the politicians do not have enough periods to fully understand their constituencies, the speaker actually points out that it does not ensure equal opportunities for people. 스피커는 현재 tem limit 에 찬성하는 입장 아닌가요? 그런데 does not ensure opportunities 라고 하면 부정적인 입장인 듯 한데요..? 스피커는 term limit 이 fair 하다고 했습니다. 다시 한번 문장 써주세요~ His main point is that the term limit encourages more young politicians to participate. Even though we can have more experienced politicians by not limiting the term, those veteran politicians will be in dogmatic and refuse to accept any change. Therefore, many young politicians should be allowed to work for better society.
On top of that, the passage's asserts that experienced politicians like Allan Greenspan or John McCain will benefit society. why? passage 의 내용 조금만 더 덧붙여주세요~ However, the speaker denies the benefit. He claims that veteran politicians are likely to become oligarchs as only few politicians hold power for a long time. Some politicians greatly contributed to the country under unlimited number of terms such as Allan Greenspan's dedication for the U.S. Federal Reserve Board for more than a decade. However, the speaker emphasizes that the unlimited system will cause semi-monarchy managed by only a major party.
Furthermore, the speaker contradicts the passage's assertion that eliminating term limit will save money. Reading 은 어떠한 생각으로 이와 같은 말을 했나요? While the reading points out the great amount of money spent for political campaigns, 그런데 그 campaign 을 안하게 되면 돈을 절약할 수 있다 이런 의미로 쓰신 건가요? 의미를 끝까지 전달해주세요 the speaker argues that the term limit will encourage more politicians representing people having various backgrounds to do what? having various backgrounds 한 정치인들을 뭐하도록 encourage 한다는건가요?. Even though the unlimited term limit allows fewer politicians to run political campaigning and use less money, the term limit will ensure all the people's voices can be heard.
For these reasons, the speaker challenges the reading passage's point about the appropriateness of removing politicians' term limit.
대체적으로 내용이 부족한 것 같습니다. Clear 하게 양 쪽의 입장이 전달될 수 있도록 부족한 내용들 채워주시면 좋을 것 같습니다. 수고하셨습니다~ |