▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage contends that there are three points explaining hypothesis how Mima mounds was formed. On the other hand the lecturer brings up several points that contradict this argument.
First the speaker argues that the local tribes do not have any legends about burying their dead there(,) and no one has ever found any human remains or tools in any of the mounds. 이러한 근거들을 통해서 SPEAKER 가 말하고자 했던 바는 무엇인가요? This casts doubt on the reading which states that it is created by Native American. READING 에서 딱 이 내용밖에 언급안했나요? 충분히 다른 뒷받침 내용들이 나왔을 것입니다. 추가해주세요.
Second, according to the lecturer, Mima mounds also are formed in many non- earthquake-prone areas around the world wrold. (여기도 내용이 부족하네요~ 그 area 에서도 형성됐는데 그것과 lecture의 주장과 무슨 관련이 있죠?) This refutes the reading passage's assertion that Mima mounds were the result of very intense ground shaking resulting from major earthquakes. 시제 체크해주세요. Reading 과 lecture 에서 어떠한 시제를 사용했는지 정확히 파악하신 후, 이번 문단처럼 여러 시제를 섞어서 쓰지 않도록 해주세요.
The final points made by the lecturer is that however, no one has found mounds like this made by modern gophers. And given the thousands of mounds, it would take have taken a lot of gophers a long time ago to make them. It has been suggested that a combination of shaking and evaporation caused the mounds, which were then colonized by the gophers. This counters the writer's claim that pocket gophers created them. (구체적인 reading 의 입장 표시 부탁드립니다.)
기본적인 표현력은 익히신 것 같습니다. 그런데 내용이 많이 부족합니다. 양 쪽 입장이 균형을 이룰 수 있도록 각각의 입장과 그에 해당하는 근거들을 적절하게 서술해주시길 바랍니다. 시제 확인 꼭 하시구요~ 수고하셨습니다! |