▶ Your Answer :
According to the reading passage, planting trees and flowers vegetation on roofs can give us many advantages. Contrarily, the lecturer argues that these advantages are overly exaggerated compared to the actual benefits (that) people can get.
To begin with, the lecturer argues that living roofs will not solve the shortage of city parks. This is because even though space for park park space is created on the roofs, many people cannot access to it unless they work in the building. So, there is not much point in having park space on roofs if it is not accessible. (reading 의 입장과 근거는 어디에 있나요?)
Secondly, the lecturer points out that green roofs don’t necessarily enhance aesthetics of cities. This is because people walking on the sidewalks can hardly enjoy the beauty of green roofs. (again. No information about reading passage’s claim.)
Lastly, the lecturer says that living roofs costs a lot since additional costs will be needed to maintain them don’t result in cost savings because they accompany additional costs. Green roofs may save on energy, but it costs a lot to establish and maintain a living roof. Consequently, the overall cost of having a green roof overweighs the money saved on energy. This argument challenges the reading passage’s claim that green roofs are cost-effective offer cost savings.
전반적으로 내용이 많이 부족합니다. Reading 의 내용이 많이 없으니 추가적으로 서술해주시기 바랍니다! 수고하셨습니다~ |