▶ Your Answer :
It is generally accepted truth that everyone take care of their family. But, the only difference is time because consuming their family varies from person to person. Some people believe that people living in cities care their family members more than those living in rural areas. This is because cities have useful facilities for people, also they can tend their kid’s education sufficiently. In spite of that, I am in favor of the idea that it is better to take care of members of family in rural areas. There are two reasons : Men can pay more attentions to family due to a little culture facilities. Men do not need to live apart from family.
First, persons can have an attention to family because they spend much more time in house. There are few utilities in urban areas. In other word, in countryside it is hard to seek facilities which people can enjoy with their friends or others. Therefore people return to home early. Then they spend most of rest time a day with family in house. And next, they can have a diner together and talk own activities. On the other hand, in city, various facilities make people to use them. And thus, after finishing their works, they would go to theaters, shopping mall etc. eventually they should have the most of time in outside.
Secondly, whereas some people in cities live apart from their family cause narrow spaces and higher cost. Generally, housing fee is pretty higher prices. So if people want to buy large house, they cannot afford to do it. In the end, they are willing to separate from each other. Although in rural areas, relatively housing cost is less. Also there are a lot of wide lands. And then, it is extended enough to live together there. To take my cousin’s example, she have to buy an apartment which she and her husband dwell. She and he wants to seek for an apartment in Seoul. However it costs too much. So they decide to purchase house in countryside of Seoul. After all, they purchase a house where it is big enough to accommodate . it is same costs compared with cities’ costs. |