▶ Your Answer :
There is a controversy between the speaker and the writer as to whether a group studying is beneficial or not. The lecturer argues that even though it looks beneficial a lot, in reality, it isn't at all. It goes against writer's claim.
To begin with, the lecturer argues that it discourages is discouraging students. For example, there are some students who don't do their homework or even don't attend their study group meeting. These kinds of students give negative impact on discourage other students. (일단, discourage 라는 단어는 앞에서 이미 사용하셔서 조금 바꿔봤습니다. 또 한가지는 discourage 한다면 어떤 식으로, 어떤 영향을 준다는 것인지 구체적으로 밝히시면 좋겠습니다.) This explanation directly opposes that the writer's assertion that it is encouraging students by studying together especially who have difficulty in studying alone. (how does it work? Reading 에 이 질문에 답할 수 있는 설명이 있다면 그것까지도 요약/정리해주세요.)
On top of that, the lecturer maintains that there are lots of free riders in studying group (studying in group promotes a lot of free riding). To be specific, students who do not study well students who have less admiration (어떤 의미로 쓰신 건가요?) in study are likely to rely on other students who are smarter/ have more. This contradicts the writer's opinion that it would have good impact on themselves by teaching themselves or sharing useful materials.
Lastly, the lecturer claims that there would be misuse of time especially for smarter students. Unfortunately, some students should review some topics again even though they know for others who do not understand to keep studying together. This explanation casts doubt on the reading passage's argument that they would save time by scattering their burdens because they could reduce duplicated efforts. (reading 에서 추가적으로 설명한 내용들이 있다면 그것까지 써주세요.)
전반적인 양쪽의 대조적인 입장은 잘 catch 하셨지만 설명하는 데 있어서 정보가 약간 부족합니다. 내용만 조금 더 보충해주시면 좋을 것 같습니다. 수고하셨습니다~ |