▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage lists that today in these days metal resources are getting scarcer, and
people have to provide a solution such as excavating metal from under the sea.
However, the speaker argues that it is a true fact that we are lacked lacking of metal resources, but to excavate the ground
of the sea is not rational for some reasons.
To begin with, according to the article, there are
gigantic amount of metal resources in beneath the sea, also the type of the
resources has considerable diversity. However, the speaker argues that if
people want to extract investigate the
beneath sea, they have to ready for need to
have diverse skills. Moreover, the resources are not certified, and they
maybe may be dirty to use. <두 번째 문장에는
동사가 없었습니다. 항상 완벽한 문장에는 주어+동사가 들어가는 거 잊지 마세요~
^^> In addition, people who may
work for extracting have to deal with conveying problems.
On top of that, this is also argued that
excavating of the metal will not relate to contaminating the world.
On the contrary, the lecturer claims that people have to concern an ecosystem
of the sea. In detail, they may position to deep sea, and diverse stuffs will
follow them. In this manner, the sea including their land is contaminated by those
human’s effects the work of human.
<설명이
많이 부족한 거 같습니다. 더
구체적으로 쓰셔야 할 것 같아요 ^^>
Lastly, the reading passage points out that there are
is no problems problem
such as a constitution of national organizations. Furthermore, the excavating
the sea is protected by the law of the United Nations. On the other hand, the
speaker completely says that the United Nations mentioned about
above the ground, not the materials under the ground. In this manner, if people
excavate the beneath sea to solve the raw resource’s problem, it must be illegal behaviors. In addition, the speaker
mentioned that this excavating is related to partial nation’s problem, not whole world’s problem.
이유가 뭔가 부족한
것 같습니다. 문법상에는 별 문제가 없는데, 좀 더 타당한
이유를 적어주시면 좋을 것 같네요. 수고하세요 ^^ |