▶ Your Answer : The reading passage contends that Mars is a suitable planet to live for people. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several points that contradict this argument. To begin with, the reading passage argues that there is liquid water which is crucial resource people to live. On the contrary, the lecturer refutes this idea saying that it is proved by analyzing. This is a simple conclusion derived from the mere comparison between Earth and Mars. Although they have water geologically, this is not the basis that it is possible for people to live there. Secondly, the reading passage claims that people can endure the Martian atmosphere. However, the speaker debunks that it is impossible to live in the hot air. Although they are Microbes, it is not mean humans also be able to live there. This is because human is too weak to live an extreme environment. We do not survive in harsh conditions such as freeze places or hot places. Lastly, the reading passage explains that NASA’s Exploration Program has detected traces of methane gas in the Martian atmosphere. The speaker contradicts this idea saying that it is not perfectly reliable. ES team investigated the whole Mars surface but they could not find any methane. Thus it is groundless to say that there is methane gas in there.
speaker 라고만 하지 말고 from listening lecture라는걸 명확하게 설명해주세요. 그리고 listening내용이 약간은 짧은 편입니다. 최대한 많이 듣고, 자세하게 적을 수 있도록 listening하는거 중요합니다 reading과 listening간의 비교 글 자체는 괜찮은 편이나 전체적으로 봤을 때 길이가 너무 짧은 편입니다.
설명 자체가 제대로 되지 않으니, 전체적인 흐름을 잡기가 조금은 힘듭니다.
|