▶ Your Answer :
In the lecture, the speaker contends that
the reading's methods are not viable. This casts doubt on the reading's point
that there are plausible methods to reduce atmospheric CO2 levels.
Firstly, the speaker argues that increasing
the amount of phytoplankton does not work. This is because it causes CO2
increase again. To be specific, as time went by, the number of phytoplankton is
decreased and only little CO2 is reduced actually. This is in contradictory to
the reading passage's point that one method is to increase the amount of
phytoplankton by adding iron to the oceans.
Secondly, the speaker mentions that it
takes long time to make artificial wetlands. In other words, it will be too late
when the wetlands help CO2 to reduce. This is in direct opposition to the
reading passage's insistence that creating artificial wetlands is another good
way to sequester CO2.
Lastly, the speaker maintains that if CO2
is stored in abandoned coal mines, there might generate to burn by methane.
This situation makes carbon and CO2. Thus, atmospheric CO2 levels are not
reduced. This rebuts the reading passage's assertion that CO2 can be stored in
abandoned coal mines.
speaker가 어디서 나온 speaker인지 정확하게 명시하는거 정말 중요합니다. 통합형의 가장 중요한 포인트는 비교인만큼 화자가 누구인지 알 수 있어야 비교가 됩니다 어휘가 많이 기본적입니다.
썼던 단어가 반복적으로 나오는 구간도 꽤 있다보니 최대한 다양한 표현 쓸 수 있다면 읽을 때 가독성 더 좋을 것 같아요.
|