There is on-going controversy which is proior between arts and rnvironments. Some people say that arts are the most important thing, others do environments. In my case, i strongly support that environments are more precious thing than the arts. there are two reason why i stand this way. Due to short time to address and size of money, we should put environments ahead of arts.
To begin with, if environment is polluted at once, we can make it reversible any longer. On the contrary, we can make the arts better and better through generations. That is the reason why we pour our monetary and social energy into environment at first. It will not be late for us to address artical enhancement later. We can say it is time for us to hurry up for the environmetal problems. For example, global warming which started European areas is on the verge of effects on the whole globe now.
On top of that, we must spend much more money on environmentS than arts. Sometimes we need to cooperate inter-countries and inter- continentals, because it takes
too much time and working forces. So rich organizations such as nations, companies,
conglomerates, cooperations should give their hands to the environmental protection campaigns. let's remember tha yellow wind which originates from the mongolian desert in the China territory. it affects korean peninsula and japanese islands too in spring time.My suggestion for the yellow winds is that not only governments but also the companies in the Asian countries should participate in the campaign for yellow sands simultaneously.
For the reasons above, i maintain that our company should give its help to the environmental aspects at first, due to time and money aspect. If i have option between art and environment, i will select the emvironment first without hesitation.
|