Both the lecture and the reading hold different positions, respectively, on the issue of studying in groups. The lecture’s argument is formed around many points that are in direct contrast to the material in the reading passage.
First, the professor points out that some students never do their assignments, which could disintegrate their study groups. The professor also notes that some students do not show up during the group study time thereby other students in same groups being discouraged because of them. This directly contradicts the claim in the reading that group study serves good motivation and inspiration for group members to study.
Second, the professor also argues that some students depend on smarter students who can explain class materials or difficult concepts to them. According to the professor, clever students would waste much time to teach dependent students who should have already known the information. This argument by the professor refutes the claim by the reading that students in groups are able to support each other by sharing knowledge or explaining difficult topics.
Finally, the professor concludes by saying that some group members would chat in the study time, interrupting other students. Thus, the professor claims that group studying could be changed into group socializing. Accordingly, this point by the professor challenges the reading which argues that students involved in groups are able to save time searching information or data.
In conclusion, the reading passage presents three aspects with regards to advantages of group study. However, the professor’s argument makes it clear that none of these characteristics justify the reading passage’s claim.
의견 남겨주시면 귀담아 듣겠습니다..!