▶ Your Answer :
According to the listening passage, working in rural areas brings a lot of beneficial factors for doctors. This challenges to the reading passage’s claim that it is hard for doctors to work in remote regions.
Firstly, Living in rural areas lures doctors to live in there by providing financial benefit. Generally, living expenses in rural regions are low when compare(d?) to urban areas ones. This idea goes against the reading passage’s oppinion that remote areas do not have econmonical adventage to(for?) doctors.
Secondly, medical professions can improve themselves by using computers. Thanks to the advance of computer technology, many doctors are able to fortify their medical skills and get a lot of medical knowledge via the Internet. This contradicts the part in the reading passage where it says, if doctors live in rural areas, they will be deprived of a chance to develop themselves due to a lack of information.
Thirdly, although remote regions do not have that many amuse(attractive?) facilities, the amount of doctors who change their residence from city to country is increasing. Due to beautiful landscape and comfortable lifestyle of rural areas, many medical professions are moving their habitats to remote regions. From this aspect, the opinion stated in the reading that many young doctors are unwilling to do medical works(acts랑 performances써도 되나요?의술을 하다/펼치다 라는문장은 어떻게 쓰나요?)in country areas because of insufficiency of covenient facilities is not correct.
In conclusion, the listening passage weakens the reading passage.
|