처음 공부해보는 거여서 많이 부족해요 ㅠㅠㅠ하나라도 도와주세요ㅠㅠㅠ
The reading passage contends that allowing students to eat their lunch off campus have many benefits. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several points that contradict this argument.
First of all, the lecturer argues that the less number of restaurants cannot permit many students, so it makes chaotic. This is because, the number of restaurants is limited around school, but that area has a lot of schools. Thus, restaurants have difficulty serving. This cast doubt on the reading which states that school makes high efficiency by minimizing the line and time to wait in cafeteria
Second, according the reading, starting the plane that student use off campus restaurant in their lunch makes many troubles. One significant reason is that student doesn’t monitored by supervisor, when they eat lunch off campus. So they can drink easily without protection. This fact refutes the reading passage’s assertion that eating off campus avoids many bad facts such as student’s fighting.
The last point in the lecture is that eating off campus may negatively affect students. To be specific, students can feel isolated, which makes a lot of stress. In addition, they cannot prepare their next class. This point rebuffs the reading passage’s argument that student have a chance to refresh, which affects their afternoon classes positively.