▶ Your Answer :
The lecturer insists that people trying to establishing living proof overlook its disadvantages. This contradicts the reading passage's claim that living proof can have diverse pros and can be affect beneficial to people.
First, the speaker argues that living proof is not accessible can't provide people with good access. For example, when living proof is located on top of a building, people should go up to there for taking a rest / relaxing. As a result, this inconvenience access hinders people to take a rest there far surpasses taking rest in there. This casts doubt on the reading passage, which states that people can enjoy various kinds of its function aside from taking a rest be offered with living proof as a various kinds of functions.
Second, living proof can harm to the building that it is created/made/set up according to the speaker, living proof can be harm to the building they are installed in. This is because water, absorbed rain into soil and plants on the roof, could damage the building and its material since roots of plants penetrate top floor if rainwater is absorbed into the soil and plants on the roof,' water will and damage to the building material by plant’s roots penetrating top floor. This rebuffs the reading passage's assertion that living proofs can prevent flooding and be beneficial to the urban areas by absorbing water.
The final point made by the lecturer is that setting up installing living proof is very expensive and cost of maintenance maintenance of that also cost a lot is also high. It is because plants on the proof are necessary take some time and need nutrient for their proper functions. This refutes the reading passage's argument that living proofs are economical because they can modulate urban temperature.
è 전체적으로 봤을 때 living proof 가 아니라 living roof 가 아닐까 하는 생각이 듭니다. 맞는지 확인해주세요. Living roof 라는 전제로 첨삭했습니다.
è 댓글에 나와있는 것 처럼 다양한 표현방법을 사용하는 것도 좋습니다. 위의 글에 다른 표현들을 사용해보는 것도 괜찮을 것 같네요 ^^
|