▶ Your Answer :
In the industrial society like this, sometimes human needs like housing, farming, and industry is considered prior to saving environments for endangered animals. But, some people disagrees with idea which means they think we should protect the endangered animals from industrilization. To me, human needs should be given priority to endagngered animals. First, human is the superior. And second, to human, protecting animals is not beneficial.
First of all, since the human is kind of ruler of the earth, losing space for endangered animals are needed sacrifice in the process of the human race. To be specific, I am not meaning that we have to eliminate the other spicies which are different with us. What I am saying is that for the development of the society of human, sacrife of the other species is unevitable and therefore their sacrife is neccesary for the greater good.
Secondly, saving endangered animals place to live is not beneficial for human. As our society is moved by making profits, making an huge extra land for the animals are impossible. For example, we all know global warming is coming and the only solution is to not cut the tree, and to not use the fossil energy. But still we are cutting lots of trees for the profit of mankind.
In conclusion, all thing considered, although the endangered animals are confronting the extinction, it is more important to use land for human demands than saving land for the animals.
|