▶ Your Answer :
The lecturer describes work-at-home is ineffective, such as not concentrating on their work, feeling depression, and mixing works and home problems. This contradicts the reading passage’s claim that work-at-home is good for employers and employee. First, the lecturer argues drawbacks of employer. Employees who work in their home waste time to do other things because nobody monitors them. In addition, wasted money on work-at-home is much bigger than spending money on real estate. However, the reading passage contradicts employers can save their money because they don’t pay money for space, and employees’ productive increases because they work in comfortable environment. Second, the lecturer argues drawbacks of employee. If employees don’t meet other co-works, they can feel isolated and become depressed. Furthermore, because employees don’t commute, they can’t separate their mental to work and home. For this reason, melting all things affects employees’ productivity and concentration, and then their productivity is lowered. However, the reading passage casts doubt on that. Employees can build their family membership and use enough time to improve self-development. In addition, because employees don’t commute to company, they can take up time, and they can use their mental and physical energy to improve their productivity. |