Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to be a member of a group than to be the leader of a group.
On the whole, some people think that it is better to be a member of a group than to be the leader of a group. Nevertheless, others think that being the leader of a group is better than being a member of a group. I agree with the latter statement. There are two reasons and examples supporting my ideas.
Besides, the leader of a group is possible to be multi-tasker at workplace. Why they can be a multi-tasker? This is because many leaders working enterprise and company can learn self-confidence and passion there. To be specific, these days, many people study to be multi-tasker because multi-tasker is acknowledged as a nice person better than others. Like them, I am studying English to be a leader of social group. Though I can do my work well through my major, I am studying TOEFL and ESL in Canada. The main reason why I learn English is to have a good quality as a multi-tasker.
To sum up, being the leader of a group is more important than being the member of a group. Yet, I have never working experienced such as an enterprise or a company. Therefore, If I have a chance to do work at workplace, I would like to get experience and learn how to be a good leader.