To begin with, the reading passage have explained that Graffiti artists
have faced on many problems such as opposition and criticism. It also mentioned
that the Graffiti artist often got arrested by the police. In addition to this,
the professor agrees with the reading passage. He said that Graffiti art can
ruin private property and destroys the neiborhood. He also mentioned that this
art attributes on increasing the crime rate of a neighborhood.
Secondly, the reading passage said that graffiti is ugly becasue it ruins
private or even public property. On the other hand, the professor's thought was
slightly different from this. He gave Christo, the Graffiti artist, as an
example. The professor said that different from other Graffiti artists, Christo
is very careful on what he is doing. Everytime he asked permission for drawing
on the private or public properties. In addition, he only displayed his work
for couple of weeks. After that he through the work away and with the material
that he disposed, he made another work.
Lastly, the reading passage suggested to encourage the Graffiti artist by
giving them public places that only allow the purpose of drawing Graffiti arts.
However, the professor disagrees with this. Instead, he suggested to clean up
all the trashes that the Graffiti artists have made as a punishment. Thus,
instead of leading them to make more Graffiti art as reading passage suggested,
the professor suggested to encourage the Graffiti artists to learn many
beautiful arts other than the Graffiti. |