Some cities have given thought to establishing a congestion charge. What the reading passage is focused on is that it will certainly adds various adavantages to people's daily, but the speaker claim that the congestion charge might be adverse effets.
First of all, Although the reading passage mentioned that the statistics, was debatable for 6 months, finally showed us the fact that entering cars the central zone has reduced approximately 30 percentages, the speaker said that due to driver's unchangeble habit, it would not be able to positive influences people's routine. Because all driver's might go to their destination via the outline of the commercial centers.
Secondly, the reading passage argues that the money saved is used for the purpose of developing community, such as parks, and as a result, many of those who live near the congested areas will be able to spends happy time with improvements. However, the speaker think that only people who live in the zones could have such advantages. This is because the collecting money is just spent for around the areas.
글자수는 178자이고요. 처음써봤습니다. 대충 이런식으로 쓰는게 맞는지 궁금해서요
첨삭까지는 안해주셔두 되구요, 댓글이라도 좀 달아주세요^^부탁드립니다.
|