It is better for governments to spend their funds on the exploration of outer space than on earthly matters. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. |
It is debatable whether spending their funds on the exploration of out space is better for governments than on earthly matters. Some people presume that saving human is more imperative and restoring the damaged environment is more pressing. However, I agree with the statement that it is beneficial for government to spend money to explore out space. In case of resources, outer space provides us with unlimited mineral and territories. By studying outer space, we can make our life more convenient. To begin with, the object of exploring out space is in case of resources. Because natural resources on the earth are limited, we have to seek for new alternative resources. So, infinity resources of outer space are good solution, if the natural resources on Earth are depleted. As countries developing, it causes overpopulation. In order to prevent this problem, we must find an alternative habitat for humans by exploration of outer space. This is reason why researchers have studied that organism could live in the Mars or find water trace for a long time. On top of that, it is worth the exploration of outer space to provide useful technologies. As you know, the artificial satellite offers many benefits, such as not only whether foresting and GPS, but also imaging technology; High-definition television, and videophone. As these technologies developed, we have more plentiful life than before. In addition to that, the satellite is used for military purposes like keeping watch other countries and protecting our country from military threat. In this way, in order to shooting up a satellite, we should understand conditions of outer space correctly. In the last, in the condition of weightlessness, we can also discover new composition. |