▶ Your Answer : Some people think that people are able to handle with their own problems without governmental aid. However, I strongly believe that it is essential for someone people to get a support from the government. There are two reasons. First, there are some large-scale issues that cannot be resolved by individuals on a personal level. Second, some people who have insurmountable disparities (어색한 표현입니다) inevitedly inevitably need the country's help.
To begin with, even though people can control some problems up to a certain level, a few fields are in dimension of state (어색한 표현입니다). In many countries, each government has a lot of subordinate departments such as a ministry of environment, land or transport. Why are these department set up despite of the demanding large amounts of tax? (이해하기가 어려운 문장입니다) Presumably, they are in charge of uncountable tasks everyday. Suppose a city was suffered from traffic congestion. The government should step forward to ease this traffic congestion with by widening a roads and so on because a person cannot settle such the matters alone. For example, my aunt does farm work in the country and she has cultivated various kinds of crops. Last year she got had trouble farming because of with toxic water coming from a nearby manufactural factory. She had protested against the plant but it was so hard for one person to stand against the large company. Eventually She she wrote made a recommendation about the problem to the district office. Before long, the department of environment examined the incident and carried out the an environmental policy that with regulating regulated toxic materials. My aunt also got compensation for the damaged of crops. I think that this episode shows a well-treated problem solving on a government scale. On the top of that, the government is under obligation to support the less previleged social weak. Any countries cannot help considering the gap between the rich and the poor or the gap between non-disabled and disabled people. Imagine the a country which is aloof to the weak and every person has to make a living individully. Would it be possible for the man lagging by nature (어색한 표현입니다) to survive in the world of endless competition? It is highly doubtful. If the government kept indifferent to the citizen's life, a disparity between a standard of living (어색한 표현입니다) would be worsened. The only key to alleviate this difference would be the government's involvment to intervention in people's life like offering a government subsidies subsidy, ensuring lifetime employment or making jobs. A strict tax system is also one of the most essential works to enhance every person's level of lifestyle (어색한 표현입니다). For instance, there is a gap between senior citizens and junior citizens among many kinds of disparities. There was a survey conducted by a group of public good majors (어색한 표현입니다) of Korea university with the senior as respondents. The purpose of the poll was to understand the consensus about financial and physical difficulties people have in today's society. The majority of the respondents replied that they have trouble with getting sick or suffering economic problems (굉장히 어색한 표현입니다). The reasons were mainly concerned with elderly people's unavoidable aging and inoccupation. (어색한 표현입니다) This surveys proves that some people have problems beyond their control then responsibility to boost them would be in a country. Nowadays, many countries are enforcing many policy policies for the elderly such as with exempting transportation expenses or supporting checkups with in no charge.
To sum up, taking (? because of 등으로 대체해주세요) large scale of issues that have to be solved by government departments and the country's duty to support the less previleged social weak, government assistance seems to be compulsory. In this regard, I firmly believe that the government is liable to aid the citizens.
Score: 17 Comments: - 구조가 잘 잡혀있습니다. - 제시하신 이유가 적절하고 설명이 잘 되어있으나 불필요한 내용이 많습니다. - 어색한 표현들이 많습니다. - 에세이 길이가 많이 깁니다. 내용을 조금 더 간결하게 해주시면 좋겠습니다.
|