▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage contents contends that the origin of dogs’ domestication has been understood completely (어색한 표현입니다.. On the other hand, the lecturer objects to the points mentioned made in the reading passage about the origin of domesticated dogs in the reading passage. The professor states that the ideas in the passage have flaws (이전 문장과 내용 반복입니다).
First of all, the lecturer argues that the claim about orphaned wolf pups is false (미완성 문장입니다, 문장을 완성시켜주세요). As speaker says, it can be impossible that people trained wolf pups to assist hunting because the hunting style between wolf wolves and humans is totally different. In addition, wolves usually get very aggressive as they get older so it would have been too dangerous to train them. This casts doubt on the author’s claim that dogs evolved from wolves.
Second, the professor points out that the argument regarding with the beginning of dogs (어색한 표현입니다) is mistaken. The professor argues the origin of dogs is earlier than 16,000 years ago. This is because a dog’s footprint was found with human footprints in a cave, and the footprints turned out it was were from 24,000 years ago. This contract contradicts the writer’s view that dogs has started to be have been domesticated since 16,000 years ago.
Finally, the speaker contends that the opinion concerning with China is flawed. The lecturer argues that the result from research related to ancient dogs’ fossils prove otherwise. It shows dogs are originated from 4 four sorts of ancient dogs from different countries. Therefore, this goes against the writer’s view that dogs’ domestication has started from China because there are various kinds of dogs which can be seen around the world.
Score: 19 Comments: - 전체적인 구조가 잘 잡혀있습니다.
- 문법 실수가 있습니다.
- 어색한 표현들이 있습니다. - 주요 포인트를 잘 언급해주셨지만 문법 실수나 어색한 표현 등으로 인해 흐름이 끊기고 있습니다. - 첫번째 포인트 설명 조금 더 명확하고 매끄럽게 해주셨으면 좋겠습니다. lecturer argues that the flaim about orphaned wolf pups .. 이 부분에서 이 claim이 뭔지에 대한 설명도 해주셔야 합니다. |