■ Direction Read the question below. You have 30 minutes to plan, write, and revise your essay. Typically, an effective response will contain a minimum of 300 words.
■ Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Use specific reason and examples to support your answer
▶ Topic :
When a country faces an economic crisis, which of the following do you think the government should spend less money on? (Schools, Public libraries, Public transits, Military)
▶ Your Answer :
Some people think that it is better to spend less money on schools, public transits, or military, however, I do not think that it is helpful to economic crisis of a country. In my opinion, use less money on public library and save that money for compansating the money spent on schools, public transits and military is better.
To begin with, frequent usage of public library is much less than other services that government offers. Schools, public transits and military are always needed to citizens in their daily lifes. In schools’ case, when the depression is occured, many students quit their extracurricular activities and personal tutoring services to save money. For this reason, government should not spent less money on school. Recession is the time that role of schools are the most important in the field of education. Moreover, almost all the citizen take public transportation in their daily routine to go to their works or schools. They would feel overwhelmed about expensive transportation fee if government do not spend enough money on them. Also, people could exploit more public transits in the time of economic crisis because they would not tend to use money on unaffordable oil price. Military is one of the most significant thing that governmet should provide to protect the country as well. Especially when the nation has stagnation, the country is vulnerable to the attack of other countries. For example, South Korea always have some harzard of attack of North Korea. So govenment should not spend less money on military even when the economic cisis has happened.
On top of that, people do not have much time to read books when they have hard time due to lack of money. They would rather use their time working more hard, instead of reading some books. For instance, my cousin changed his behavior depends on the economic state of his country. He stared his own business about 10 years ago, and he usually prefered to read books and go to library when he had some spare time. However, the things have changed about a few years ago. His country suddenly went through severe economic recession, and his business was not going well. After the event, it was hard to see that he is reading books. Instead of reading books he focus more on his business to sell products. Like my cousin’s experience, most people do not have enough time to read books and they struggle to make a livings when their countries are having hard time. This is the reason why government could spend less money on public library.
To sum up, government should not cut the funding on schools, public transits, and militaty, but shorten funding on public library instead. In this regard, I strongly think it has more benefits to choose public library to save money of government.
모바일 환경에서 작성해서 format이 좀 이상합니다ㅠㅠ 그래도 첨삭해 주신다면 감사하겠습니다