▶ Your Answer :
In the reading, the author asserts that a new brain scan lie detector measures neural activity more accurately. However, the professor in the lecture provides several reasons as a rebuttal to the author’s point.
To begin with, the professor asserts that the brain scan lie detector cannot identify true statements perfectly. The device also holds information from the same part of the brain, which a conventional detector used to capture. (문장에 의미가 무엇인지 애매모호하네요. 조금 더 명확하게 뜻을 전달해주셨으면 합니다.) Thus, when a subject is considered embarassing, embarrassed, it is likely to be interpreted as a lie. This goes against counters the reading’s point that the new detector does not make mistakes as this type of indicator is not affected by a the subject’s level of anxiety.
In addition, the professor claims that the result of new device is still left to be interpreted subjectively. People has have minor differences on brain functions. Also, there are no standard criteria for judging lies. Therefore, people still need experts to analyze the results of the tests. This casts doubt on the author’s assertion that the brain scan lie detector can provide objective results.
Finally, the lecturer argues that brain scans are also vulnerable to intentional tricks. It is proven that complex mental activities are recognized as lies. Also, practiced lies can make fool the scanning device. This challenges the reading’s claim that the new device makes it much more difficult for a subject to trick the test.
예상점수: 24~26 총평: 전체적으로 굉장히 직관적으로 글을 잘쓰신 것 같습니다. 다만 문장들이 애매해질 때가 있어서 그런 부분만 좀 조심해서 글을 써주시면 될 것 같습니다. 수고 많이하셨습니다! |