▶ Your Answer : In the reading passage, there is ample support are ample supports for the author's claim that the neck posture of sauropods were almost certainly held in a horizontal position the horizontal neck position of sauropods. However, the professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the author's point.
First, the professor contends that it is not very convincing because their talis were slender, not heavy enough. So it would not cause a balance problem. So, the sauropods did not have to keep their heads horizontally. This casts doubt on the reading passage's claim that the sauropod's neck was held horizontally is the special position of its tails to maintain its balance to act as a counterweight. Next, the professor insists that marine vegetation was not that sufficient to supply as their diet. So, they must eat greater range of food that are not limited as low-lying plants. This counters the reading passage's assertion that their neck was held horizontally due to sauropod's diet consisted majority of marine vegetation. Finally, the professor argues that sauropods used strong shoulder muscles instead of weak neck muscles. By using the strong shoulder muscles, they were able to raise their neck vertically. This refutes the reading passage's suggestion that it was incapable to raise the neck vertically due to heavy weight and long length of the dinosaur. Good: 24~30 점수: 27 대채로 리딩과 리스닝을 잘 비교하엿습니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 것은, 얼마나 적절하게 잘 비교하였냐 입니다. 이러한 부분에 있어서는 잘 서술된 거 같습니다. 하지만 약간의 아쉬움은, 전반적으로 좀 더 리딩과 리스닝을 설명하는 것이 더 좋을 거 같습니다. 충분한 정보가 들어갔다고 생각하지만, 더 많은 정보가 들어가있다면 더 좋은 에세이가 될 수 있을 거 같습니다. 수고많으셨습니다. |