▶ Your Answer :
The lecturer argues that relocation of reptiles isn't is not issue at all. This contradicts the reading passage's claim that relocation of them to safer envionments environment is not a viable conservation tool. First of all, the lecturer argues that we can deal with the problem due to the overpopulation. The speaker explains that we can solve overpopulation by creating new spaces or increasing the capacity of habitat. For example, in the UK, there were any lizard at first in the city. When sand lizard were relocated to the new place, they did not compete for food. Also people could accommodate sand lizards by putting some rocks and burrows. This casts doubt on the reading which states that it can bring about overpopulation. In addition, according to the speaker, spreading the disease can be avoided. The speaker maintains that they could avoid by examing reptiles regulary. Establishing several population, the doctor visited them and examined the reptiles. When the doctor discovers some of the sick reptiles, then they remove them at the envionmen. In this way, infection would have been limited. This rebuffs the reading passage's assertion that relocation can contribute to the spread of disease. The final point made by the lecturer is that it can be solved by the basic way. The speaker says that placing a small amount of water protect reptiles from the danger of dehydration. Also when people put some moss in their habitat, they are possible to quite dangerous from predator. This refutes the reading passage's argument that reptiles may be injured and killed while they are being captured. Good: 24~30 점수: 26 대채로 서로 다른 정보를 가진 리딩과 리스닝을 적절하게 잘 비교하였습니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 필요한 것은 얼마나 적절하게 리딩과 리스닝을 비교하였냐 입니다. 하지만 지금 이 에세이에서 아쉬운 부분은 리딩에 대한 정보가 너무 빈약하다는 겁니다. 한 문장으로 리딩의 설명을 끝내는 것 보다는 리스닝을 반박할 수 있는 몇몇 문장을 더 서술하시는 것이 통합형 에세이에서는 필요합니다. 이것을 주의하면서 에세이를 서술하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셧습니다.
|