▶ Your Answer : Some take
it for granted that government need to spend money on building new structure
than preserving historic or traditional buildings. However, contrary to this
notion, it is clear that there are more advantages of preserving historic or
traditional buildings. I will explain this based on the following reasons.
First of
all, government can get advantage by preserving historic or traditional
buildings. To be specific, those historic and traditional buildings are great tour
attractions for other foreign people around the world. So, by investigating on
preserving those buildings, government can get advantages. For example, there
are many historical and traditional buildings in Kyeong-ju such as temples and
palaces. Due to its unique shapes and structures, it attracts many foreign people,
who are enthusiastic to learn about different cultures.
Moreover,
spending money on preserving historic or traditional buildings can save people
from stress. Specifically, when government decide to build new structures, it causes
stress to people due to air pollution, noise attack. For instance, one of my friends
live in nearby the structure under construction. She said that every day she
can smell the gas from machines, they use for building, and hear noises from the
constructions. She was so stressful of this construction that she moved out
from her place.
In
conclusion, I disagree with the statement that it is better for the government
to spend money on building new structures than preserving historic or
traditional buildings for the reasons I mentioned above: tour attractions and surviving
from stress. |