해커스 토플 인터미디엇 156
52
The lecturer claims that three methods to solve a solving the problem of emerald ash borer are not convincing is incapable.
This contradicts the reading's passage that there are several ways to solve the problem of destruction wood of ash trees destroyed by emerald ash borer.
The first point made in the passage is that eliminating the trees in which borers live is utilitarian, in which a lot of the borers live because the tree is so easy to be identified.
The lecturer, however, challenges this particular viewpoint by arguing that the trees of a symptom which are used by living place for the borers occur at least after two years. (What does it mean?)
To be more specific, it is hard to find the infested tree due to an numerous number of trees except an urban area. (Why not in urban areas?)
Another point puts the article an emphasis on is that insecticidescan cease prevents the adult borers from laying their eggs and wiping out larvae.
In contrast, the lecturer contends that the insecticides contaminate a the water under the ground and it is useless in some circumstance. (What circumstances?)
He further indicates that if a lot of larvae already live in the tree, the insecticides can't make a good result (Such as?) since the larvae block the circulatory system to draw up the insecticide.
Finally, it is stated in the reading that wasps annihilate borer larvae by laying their eggs in them.
On the contrary, it is accentuated in the lecture, wasp's surviving is mainly dependent eagerly depending on the region, it is different with borer. (Meaning?)
He gives a detail that using wasps can harm other organisms in the tree.
채점기준표 | Grammar | Contents | Example | Coherence |
점수 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Score | Limited 10-15 |
- 리스닝의 분량이 많이 부족하며, 근거 역시 충분히 제시되어 있지 못한 편입니다. - Key words & Ideas를 유추하여 정리하는 연습부터 많이 해주세요. |