▶ Your Answer : In the reading passage, there is ample support for the author's claim that attracting new businesses by giving incentives creates a lot of positive outcomes for locals. But the professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the author's point. First, the professor contends that attracting new businesses do not make more money. In fact, it causes rather overall tax lost due to tax rebate. Since the new businesses pay less tax, the total tax revenue will not increase. And this casts doubt on the reading passage's claim that inducing the new enterprises will enhance the tax revenue available for local investment. Second, the professor argues that getting the novel businesses to the local area do not make more jobs. If the companies come into the area, then they will compete with the local companies. And the probability of the local companies will lose is bigger. This results in the job loses. This counters the reading passage's assertion that the new companies can make a bunch of new jobs for local people. Finally, the professer insists that it would not be helpful to the local environment. Unfortunately, it can add more pollution. If they want to be a green company and not to generate pollution, they should use only conventional factories. This refutes that the reading passage's suggestion that it will assist the local surrounding to be better.
Fair: 17~23 점수: 23 리딩에 대한 정보가 부족한 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에 있어서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가진 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박하는 지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우는 리스닝에 대한 정보는 충분하게 나와있지만 리딩에 대한 정보는 한 문장으로만 끝났습니다. 따라서 한 문장으로 끝내는 것 보다는 리스닝을 좀 더 비교할 수 있는 부분들을 더 서술하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셨습니다. |