wind farm 해로운가? |
The lecturer describes some of the positive characteristics of wind farms, as opposed to the reading passage's negative description. While the reading passage argues that wind farms kill innumerable birds, are noisy, not beautiful, and less efficient, the lecturer directly rebuts this argument by saying that wind farms kill less birds than other human activities, are not vociferous, do not harm landscape, and are economical. First, it is hard to say that wind farms are deadly to many birds and bats, since there are other human activities which are more lethal than wild farms. While airplanes intrigue birds and kill them often, wind farms do not allure birds, and is less damaging to birds. Accordingly, wind farms' negative effect on birds and bats is negligible compared to other human activities and this refutes the reading passage's assertion that wind farms are Second, recent wind farms are more silent and beautiful. They are less noisy than previous ones, and now it is possible to converse under the wind farms without shouting. Moreover, they do not have a negative influence on landscape any more because their design is getting better. This contradicts the reading passage's saying that wind farms make noise due to turbine and are not good to see. Third, wind farms are economically beneficial. Now they can be situated anywhere and are more productive than before. Furthermore, they do not require sites with sufficient amount of winds. This casts dobut on the reading passage's negative argument that wind farms are not a good choice when it comes to economic profit since there are many prerequisites for wind farms to be constructed. |