Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more advantageous for children to grow up in rural areas than in big cities. |
It is of great valure to discuss whether or not it is more advantageous for children to grow up in rural areas thatn in big cities. Some people would disagree with the statement since they think that there are more facilities for children's studying in big cities rather than in rural areas. As for me, however, I insist that rural areas are the most important places for children's development for the following reasons; first, nature in rural areas allow children to lean about the importance of life; second, the children's health will be stayed healthy because of the fresh air or and so on.
To begin with, rural areas can provide children more opportunities to experience the nature such as flowers, plants, and a wide variety of insects than big cities. In general, children in big cities are pretty busy because they have to go to the academic schools like music, math, and english institutions by the order of thier parents. Their such busy dailylife deprive chances to play with nature from them. However, since usually rural children is more feely aside from so many unnecessary activities; I think that studying by one's paretns is useless, these children can have more chances to enjoy the nature and realize the valuable life of platns or animals. For example, children in rural areas tend to spend thier time being in the naure such as mountains and creeks and so on. To play pleasantly, they use the nature and maybe they will consider the one as thier friend. So, like friendship among real humans, the relationship between children and the nauture will be more developed so that naturally children can realize the importance of everything in the nature.
Another reason is that lots of beneficial things of the nature will make children in rural areas more heathier than ones in big cities. In fact, there are so many factors in the nature that are very profitable for people's health. So many people have been going the places surrounded by the nautre such as mountains and sea to spend thier vacation. For instance, let's think about the air. Actually the air in the mountains is more fresher than the one in big cities. Not only that but the water in the nature such as creeks and valleys is more better for our health than the one in big cities. If children will be resided in rural areas, they can use these all of things freely so that thier health will be more better. In addtion to the physical benefits, there are so many mental benefits in the nauture. Think about the beautiful scenery of the sea. In particular, I love the scenery of rising sun at the horizon. I am always reassured when I see that. So I have gone to the sea whenever I am suffered by my problems.
In conclusion, I agree with the statement that it is more advantageous for children to grow up in rural areas than in big cities. That's because the developed between the children and nature will let children to know the importance of the nature, and because the physical and mental benefits of the nature will make childern in rural areas more healthier than ones in big cities. I firmly believe that our children will be more matured by experiencing those things in rural areas. |