저는, 리스능이 약해서 렉쳐가 말하는 것을 다 캐치 못합니다. 그래서. 에세이 쓸때, 리딩부분을 먼저 쓰고, 리스닝 보다 리딩부분에 중점을 두고씁니다. 이러면, 점수 많이 깍이나요??
밑줄 친 부분은 제가 평소 안쓰던 표현을 써봤는데, 문법상 오류가 있거나, 좀 WEIRD 하다면 지적 부탁드립니다.
내일이 셤인데,,,, 끝나느데로, 후기 올려드리겠습니다. 저는 미쿡! ------------------------------------------------------------------ WORK-AT-HOME SYSTEM에 대한 찬(리딩), 반(렉쳐러) 리딩, WAH은 좋다, 기업측면> 1. 건물 짓을 필요가 없어서, 비용절감, 2. 집에서 일하는 일꾼들의 생산성이 높다는 연구결과. 일꾼측면> 1. 자기 시간이 많이 생기기때문에, 가족들과 사이가 좋고, 개인 여가즐길수 있다. 2. 출근 안해도 된다.
리스닝, WAH BAD 기업측면> 일꾼들이 감시하는 사람들이 없어서 초과 휴식을 취한다. --> 생산성이 떨어져서, 건물비용감소분을 TRADEOFF시킨다. 일꾼측면> 가족 외에는 만나는 사람이 없어서, DEPRESSED 되고, 출퇴근을 안하기 때문에, 직장과 집을 구별 못하게 된다.
|
The reading passage asserts that the work-at-home system has some advantages. On the other hand, the lecturer has an opposite idea of the reading, and he gives some grounds why the system is not an effective way. According to the reading passage, the work-at-home system has beneficial effects on companies with two advantages. Firstly, they can save real estate cost because they do not need to spend their money to erect building. Next, since workers do better their works in their home, corporations can get the results of high productivities. The professor, however, objects the writer's ideas. According to the professor, rather the productivity of the work-at-home system is worse than those when they work at the office because many employees who work in their home take excessive breaks. This is resulted from absence of monitor. So, although the company can save real estate cost, they totally lose money because of staff’s neglects. Next, the writer talks that employees can maintain wonderful relationships with their families and can enjoy personal lives. Besides that, they do not need to commute, so they can save time and energies, and they can put their remained energy to more productive use. On the other hand, the lecturer asserts that the system is not as much efficient as the writer thought. Most of all, employees are depressed since they have no human interaction except for their families. Furthermore, they could not distinguish between work place and home because they do not commute. So, the professor claims that working at home system is not necessary. |