피플의 자유가 침해될수 있는가? ps/ 30분의 압박이 정말 크네요 ㅠ 다른 분들은 그냥 쭉 막힘없이 쓰시나봐요ㅠ; 개요짜는데만 5분 넘게 걸리니 시간이 너무 부족해요 ㅠ 귀찮으시다면 밑줄친 부분이라도 꼭 봐주세요!! |
In today's world, the society is changing toward more individualism than ever before, from west countries to asian countries, which means people require more freedom. When we consider less 200 years ago about a slavery system it must be the surprising change. However, like everything else, this change has entailed a problem between people's right and public order. In my opinion, I strongly agree that sometimes people's freedom should be limited in that this is need to control the society for protecting them as well as increase most member's happiness. First of all, even though people's freedom is the important right in democratic, in certain cases it should be refreined to control the society. To illustrate, if everyone demand only their benefit blindly, the society will be confusing. In 70's and 80's of South Korea, there were often huge strikes. Altough a strike were ensured by a law, sometime these became out of contol, finally violent and damaged to the society. At that time, many riot police, demonstrator, and citizen hurted, even died. In this case, nobody agree that this is freedom. In addtion, in order to realize public happiness, a few people's freedom should be yielded from time to time. As a good example, there is a smoking issue. For a decade many areas have been desigated as non-smoking areas. Some people argue that this is definitely ingringing upon human's right. It is plausible, but when we consider the rest of people who should be defended from secondhand smoking, we should prevent smoker from certain areas. To sum up, for maintaining the society as well as public happiness people's freedom should be limited. Therefore, as a member of society, we should realize that when we demand our benifits we shoud consider what our assertion affect to the society. |