Many politician say that the only way to solve the problem about how government conserve energy is increasing tax of gaoline and electricity. because, it will bring the use of energy under their control . however, In oppsition to this view, I strongly believe that this way isn't sole exit to resolve the issue. The rationale behind this is searching for alternative energy is much more effective,in the long run. Moreover ,augementing cost wouldn't work efficiently
To begin with, seeking out new methods to conserve energy is much more direct answer to deal with this problem than increasing the costs. This is largely because, around today, the significance of looking for substitute sources of energy has risen up, on account of deplation of recent resources such as coal, natural gases. in this regard, people should do more study to exploit it. To illustrate this point, there are so many alternative energy which have been in use. of course, its cost is much more expensive than recent energy does by now. but if people will go on to study about efficiency, it would be a ultimate resolution for energy conservation because potential amounts of this energy is infinite.
so, people need to detour their thoughts from raising costs to developing other resources
Also, Increasing in costs isn't efficient. One important reason is that this type of energy is directly related to our lives. therefore even if government curb this price, it won't be able to handle energy conservation instantly because people must use this for living. on the other hand, there would be dark side effects such as cheating or abusing. For instance, According to the report recently released by Korea Research Institute, community have sufferd from imitations of gasoline after carrying off new police of rasing its cost. main reason for occuring is that mundane people can't afford to buy gasoline constantly. so many vice people made the gasoline which is much cheaper than authentic one. on top of that, it have caused serious problems to customer such as automobile malfuction. As this study have shown, there will be more negative effects on people rather than positive influence, if government mount the cost of gasoline or electircity
To conclude, I am definitely against the opinion of increasing in cost of resources. looking for substitute energy is much more direct solution. What's more, inclination in cost is very deficient |