Disagree
It is needless to say early learning can help enhance intelligence in young ages. A research is widely explained to parents that the younger children's age is, the faster s/he can learn.
Although we acknowledge some parts of it, I think studying in early ages is not an answer for righteous ways to learn.
First of all, the question itself has paradox. Duration of curriculum cannot guratntee deeper and better comprehension. Of course, the scope can be widened while actual level cannot but be different from students.
More than that, thexts gain momentum by consolidating its contents to experience.
In my case, text says volunteering is required and rewarding whereas actual participation made me persuade other why the work is deserved to work on.
In terms of budget, too, should officers consider. The extension not only means burdening salaries of teachers but procedures also require that research of textbooks, support for meals, etc.
However, there are many disputes over the priority toward support while bills for free meal has not even fopund remarkable breathrough in mancy cities of South Korea, mainly owing to underestimated matter. Then, the harsh cannot but aggravate situation of classroom - toward children.
Quality is completely different from quantity. Duration should be reckoned on the basis of reasonable judgement that the benefits are sincerely heading its direction toward better understadning courses, comfort of students in agreeable environment. |