The lecture is generally portraying a skeptical perception toward the opinion cast by the reading passage that proclaimed the women in the portrait of the Yale Miniature is the mysterious lady Jane Grey.
The first argument of the lecturer disproves the explanation provided by the reading that the inscription XVII matches the age of the lady's coronation period. She states that because the last Roman numeral of the inscription is rubbed away and historical evidence proves the lady's coronation age as 16, a clash in the passage's logic is present.
Moreover, the lecture casts doubt on the content of the passage which explained that the agate jewel attached to the lady in the portrait is identical with another agate jewel piece part of Lady Grey's collection. She disproved the passage's explanation by vowing that using the agate jewel, a common, widespread fashion accessory in England as evidence for such a matter was surrealistic and absurd.
The last assertion made by the passage that botanical symbols of the portrait are in close relation with Jane Grey's relatives, was completely refuted by the lecture. she lastly decreed the passage by pointing out that the yellow flowers, in a botanical perception, was more close to couselcaps than wallflowers, and that it was unlikely for a artist to include a symbol of a women's brother-in-law in her portrait.
내 허접(...) 적인 글 구조상 어떤지 중점적으로 첨삭 부탁드리겠습니다!
감사합니다!!!!!