▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage argues that moth attracted by a bright light for three reasons. But the lecture explains why those three reasons are not valid. He comes up with several researches and appropriate examples that go against the reading passage's theory.
First of all, lecturer points out that moths usually fly toward the light quite long. This kind of behavior is not necessary and also inefficeint if moths use light for navigating when they attacked. And also some of scientists' research finds out that moths fly toward light even their predator is not there anymore. This calls into the question the reading passage's assertion that moth evolves to use a light when they attacked by predators.
Additionally, professor contends the flower theory. He talks the recent finding how moths find the flower in dark night. Finding said that moths use carbon dioxide as a marker of flower. He even points out that carbon dioxide level can tell the moths how much nectar in the flower, which is more efficeint than reflected light theory. This contradicts the idea presented in the reading passage that moths use light to find a flower since it can reflect the moon light.
Finally, speaker contends the heat theory by the example of the luminant matter. He argues that if moths use light as a heat source, they would not more frequently fly toward the light source that emits the less heat than others. But in fact, moths more likely to choose the thing that have high degree of brightness but less degree of heat. This goes against the reading passage's assertion that moths attract to the light because they use a light source to maintain body temperature at night.
Fair: 17~23 점수: 23 리딩에 대한 정보가 너무 부족한 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것 중에 하나는 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가진 리딩과 리스닝이 서로 어떻게 비교하고 반박하는지를 보는 것입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우에 있어서는 리스닝에 대한 정보는 충분하게 전달되어 있지만 리딩에 대한 정보는 한 문장으로 만 서술되었습니다. 따라서 한 문장으로 서술하는 것 보다는 리스닝을 반박 할 수 있는 부분들을 더 서술하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셧습니다. |