▶ Your Answer :
The
reading passage suggests three possible theories regarding with the reason of the red
rain in Kerala. However, the lecture counters the reading passage by saying that
one of the three theories are convincing three theories are not convincing.
First,
the lecture asserts that assuming assumption that the blood of bats caused the red rain is
far-fetched. To be specific, the required amount of blood is so massive that
about five million bats have to be destroyed simultaneously. Furthermore, no
remains of bats such as wings and bones were found. This contradicts the
reading’s claim that destroyed bats lead to the red rain.
Second,
the speaker argues that volcanic action could not have been the reason of the
red rain. The red rain occurred only in Kerala and nowhere else. If this
phenomenon was a result of volcanic eruption in the Philippines, the red rain
should have occurred in the Philippines too, or regions between Kerala and the
Philippines including Vietnam and Thailand. This rebuffs the reading’s
assertion that volcanic action brought the red rain.
Finally,
the lecturer contends that there were only few factories in Kerala. This means
that there were not enough chemicals in Kerala which could have caused the red
rain. Moreover, the red rain did not occur in cities with unfiltered chimneys.
This debunks the reading passage’s argument that industrial chemical pollution
created the red rain. Good: 24~30 점수: 28 리딩과 리스닝을 아주 잘 비교한 거 같습니다. 각각의 정보들을 충분하게 전달 한 거 같습니다. 하지만 다만 아쉬운 점은 인트로나 바디1 에서 문법적 오류와 말이 안되는 부분이 있으니 그것들만 고치면 더 좋은 에세이일거 같습니다. 수고하셨습니다. |