In this set of materials, both the lecturer and the writer cover the issue of buzzers who are recruited and sell the products to people. The lecturer entirely contradicts writer’s argument that buzzers contribute to being harmful to our society.
First, according to the lecturer, buzzers have to use products, and they consider their product positively. In this sense, companies hire those people who have experience using the products. This point reputes the writer’s argument that buzzers have no idea about what they are selling, so they tend to overstate their products.
Second, the lecturer goes on to say that buzzers are aware of the products in detail. They have to answer the customer’s question about products, when people are about to buy the products. This counters reading passage’s viewpoint that buzzers are likely not to check out their products and to sell the products to their acquaintances.
Third, the lecturer mentions that buzzers are hired by companies, which make products with high quality. In this context, people would become trustful and open to the others. This casts doubt on the writer’s claim that buzzers have bad effect on the social network and eventually give rise to destroy civilization.
대략 몇 점정도 예상되는지 .. 어느 부분이 수정이 필요하다면 과감히 지적 부탁드리겠습니다, ㅠ_-